In Financial Remedy Proceedings.

At Phillips Law we have a specialist and dedicated family team who understand that financial remedy proceedings following divorce or dissolution are among the most complex and emotionally charged areas of family law.

At this time of year when people are considering their futures and looking for a fresh start what they do not need is confusion and high costs when trying to resolve one of the most important aspects of their lives.  Decisions made now affect you both now and in the future.

The court is tasked with achieving fairness, but too often parties enter the process without a clear understanding of what they actually want to achieve. The result is confusion, distraction, escalating costs, and outcomes that satisfy no one.

Clarity of objective is not a luxury in financial remedy proceedings — it is essential.

Distraction Is a Common and Costly Problem

Financial remedy cases frequently become “bogged down” in arguments that feel important but do little to advance a party’s desired outcome. Parties can become distracted by:

• Perceived moral failings of the other party
• Historical grievances that have little financial relevance
• Attempts to “win” rather than to resolve
• Points of principle that do not materially affect settlement

This mirrors what is often seen in wider strategic contexts: stated justifications multiply, but the real objective becomes obscured. Once that happens, decision-making deteriorates.

In financial remedy proceedings, distraction is particularly dangerous because the court’s discretion is wide. Judges are not there to punish behaviour (save in exceptional circumstances) but to achieve a fair outcome based on the statutory framework.

The Legal Framework Demands Focus

Under section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the court considers factors such as:

• The welfare of any minor children
• The parties’ resources and needs
• Standard of living during the marriage
• Ages of the parties and length of the marriage
• Contributions (financial and non-financial)

What is striking is what is not included: blame, fairness as a moral concept, or emotional vindication. The court is focused on needs, sharing, and (where relevant) compensation — not on narratives that do not translate into financial outcomes.

Without a clear objective, parties often pursue arguments that have little weight within this legal framework, thereby weakening their own position.

What Does “Knowing What You Want” Actually Mean?

In financial remedy proceedings, clarity means understanding which of the following are your priorities:

• Income security versus capital retention
• Housing stability versus investment flexibility
• Clean break versus ongoing spousal maintenance
• Certainty now versus potential gains

For example, a party focused on retaining the family home may undermine that goal by pursuing aggressive litigation that erodes the very capital needed to keep it. Another may fixate on achieving “equal division” when their real need is predictable income.

A lack of clarity turns legal rights into blunt instruments.

Why Effective Legal Advice Is Critical

Effective legal advice in financial remedy proceedings is not about running every possible argument. It is about strategic discipline.

At Phillips Law our team prides itself on ensuring clients:

• Identify what outcomes are realistically achievable
• Distinguish between legally relevant issues and distractions
• Align negotiation strategy with long-term financial needs
• Avoid emotionally driven decisions that increase cost and risk

We ensure that clients are provided with effective advice that keeps the case focused on outcomes, not noise.

Just as in any high-stakes negotiation, success lies not in the number of arguments advanced, but in how well those arguments serve a clearly defined objective.

Settlement Versus Litigation: Strategy Matters

The vast majority of financial remedy cases, and especially cases we conduct, settle without a final hearing because we work as a team with a variety of experts including financial planners, accountants, and actuaries to ensure you have the right information to make informed decisions. Parties who enter the process with a clear goal are far better placed to:

• Make sensible offers
• Recognise when an offer meets their needs
• Avoid unnecessary hearings and spiralling costs

Those without clarity often litigate for longer, spend more, and ultimately accept settlements no better than those they could have achieved earlier.

Conclusion: Financial Remedy Is a Means, Not an End

Financial remedy proceedings in England & Wales are not about proving who is right or wrong. They are about reaching a fair and workable financial outcome within a discretionary legal framework.

Without a clear objective, parties risk being distracted by arguments that feel compelling but do not move the case forward. With clarity—and with effective legal advice—financial remedy becomes what it is meant to be: a mechanism for resolution, stability, and forward planning.

The lesson is simple: define the destination before choosing the route

At Phillips Law we ensure that before you even start the process, you have identified your overall goals and the possible routes to achieve it without letting ‘all the other noise; stop you from achieving that objective.

If any of these points resonate with you and you would like to discuss further, please do not hesitate to get in contact with one of our Family Solicitors.

Call us on 01256 460830 or email [email protected]. We’re here to help.

Written by Daniel Weintroub, Partner at Phillips Law.