CONSENT TO BRING EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL CLAIMS 14 MONTHS OUT OF TIME
CONSENT TO BRING EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL CLAIMS 14 MONTHS OUT OF TIME
Jacqueline Kendal

20 July 2022

Phillips Solicitor’s Employment Team represented the Claimant, Mr Baugh, a senior manager working for IBM, an international company. He has claims for unfair redundancy and age discrimination following his purported redundancy.

In the immediate aftermath of his dismissal, he began suffering from what was eventually diagnosed as a brain tumour. Surgery subsequently followed and the recovery period is still ongoing. It was, however, 14 months after his dismissal, due to his ill health, that our client first sought legal advice on bringing his claims.

Claims for unfair dismissal on the grounds of age must be brought within the statutory time limit of 3 months less one day from the termination date (subject to a maximum extension of 6 weeks during ACAS early conciliation). In order for the Employment Tribunal to have jurisdiction to even hear the claim, the Claimant would have to take all steps at a Preliminary Hearing in the Employment Tribunal to establish to the satisfaction of the Employment Judge that:

  1. it was not reasonably practicable for him to have issued his claim for unfair dismissal in time and

that the claim was issued within such further period as is reasonable; and

  1. it is ‘just and equitable’ to extend time in relation to his complaint of discrimination on the grounds of age.

Time limits in the Employment Tribunal are very strict and it is extremely difficult and rare for these time limits to be extended.

Following a full day’s Open Preliminary Hearing on Jurisdiction the Employment Judge Warren published the Reserved Judgment concluding that:

“Mr Baugh was manifestly suffering a mental impairment… I find that it was not reasonably practicable for him to have given instructions to issue proceedings to claim unfair dismissal or for him to have done so himself.

Having regard to Mr Baugh’s gradual recovery from his brain surgery, I find that his claim for unfair dismissal was issued within such further period as was reasonable.

Mr Baugh’s case is that the respondent has a policy, openly admitted in the United States, of removing older members of staff and replacing them with millennials. If that is true, there may be merit to his claim of age discrimination that deserves to be tested on the evidence. The relative balance of hardship to the parties is as is usual in discrimination cases; if his claim does not proceed, he will be deprived of the opportunity of seeking redress for discrimination. If his case does proceed, the respondent will lose the benefit of a limitation period that Parliament saw fit to put in place, albeit subject to the just and equitable test. Having regard to Mr Baugh’s state of health and his mental capacity… I find that it is just and equitable to extend time in relation to his claim for age discrimination.”

Gillian Brown of Phillips Employment Team said, “We are delighted by this outcome. It is the culmination of months of work including the gathering of significant medical evidence in support of our client’s case. It means he will now be able to bring his claims for unfair dismissal and discrimination on the grounds of his age.”

This is a fantastic result for our client and a great achievement for the Employment Team and Phillips Law!

Have more questions?
Our expert solicitors are here to take the worry off your hands.
Please call us or email and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
News
WAGATHA CHRISTIE: WHAT IS DISCLOSURE, WHY IT MATTERS AND WHY DAVY JONES’ LOCKER MIGHT NOT BE THE SOLUTION
WAGATHA CHRISTIE: WHAT IS DISCLOSURE, WHY IT MATTERS AND WHY DAVY JONES’ LOCKER MIGHT NOT BE THE SOLUTION

The Wagatha Christie trial, that concluded at the High Court last week, has certainly provided many talking points these past couple of weeks.  Whether it was the insight into the relat ...

More
NO FAULT DIVORCE
NO FAULT DIVORCE

Did you know that on 6th April 2022 the law relating to divorce was updated? Fault will no longer be a basis for divorce and this marks the biggest change to the divorce law since the M ...

More
NATIONAL INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS INCREASE – WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR YOU?
NATIONAL INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS INCREASE – WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR YOU?

Today in his Spring Statement Rishi Sunak, confirmed that the government will press ahead with its decision to use National Insurance Contributions (NICs) as a tax to help raise £36bn t ...

More
IS IT RIP TO RPI?
IS IT RIP TO RPI?

Future proofing your commercial lease for RPI reform The UK Statistics Authority (the Authority) published its response to the consultation on the reform to the Retail Prices Index (RPI ...

More
PHILLIPS APPOINTS SENIOR SOLICITOR, CLARE STRACHAN, IN THEIR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TEAM
PHILLIPS APPOINTS SENIOR SOLICITOR, CLARE STRACHAN, IN THEIR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TEAM

Leading Hampshire law firm Phillips Solicitors continues to go from strength to strength with the appointment of senior solicitor Clare Strachan, who has joined the firm as a Legal Dire ...

More
PHILLIPS SOLICITORS ARE FINALISTS FOR TWO INSPIRE21 AWARDS
PHILLIPS SOLICITORS ARE FINALISTS FOR TWO INSPIRE21 AWARDS

We are proud to be among the finalists for two INSPIRE Business Awards! This year Phillips are contenders for Large Business of the Year and for Employer of the Year. Organised by Desti ...

More